I doubt this is any stronger than Kalam

Seems to me that if the very thing you may be arguing against is doubt one of the weakest arguments may be "I know it and you don't". There may be a bit more sophistication in the way that Wartick lays it out but a straightforward articulation of his argument offers little more that personal experience.

   There may be more to this that meets the eye but if anyone sees anything other than the author stacking up more unprovable evidence and calling it more evidence, please let me know.



Move Over, Kalam, Here is the best argument for theism | J.W. Wartick -'Always Have a Reason'